So, now we know all about the tesseract. We know a considerable amount of what it looks like, AND, we understand that it can actually exist, somewhere, somehow. That “where” and “how” are just beyond our ability to understand, except for an example we will refer to later. That means it is time to move on.

We have shown in dealing with the tesseract that it possible to understand quite a bit about higher dimensions even though we cannot picture in our mind what they might look like. In other words, higher dimensions are not the incomprehensible mystery some may have thought. We were not created to be as stupid as we assumed.

We have previously written that the purpose of this paper is to provide a means, for the common individual who is not scientifically oriented, to understand, mostly by simple logic with a touch of simple science, a way to understand the cosmos. (It must be noted again, that one person’s logic may not be another person’s logic. Case in point—American logic as compared to Japanese logic will not always be the same. Have pity. I am married to a Japanese.) But when we have finished, no matter the logical disagreement which may be used against this paper, this paper will still be on the table. It is not easy to disprove another person’s logic. HOWEVER, if any part of, or all of, this paper CAN BE disproved, I will surrender on that part, We have ended up with logic vs. logic, no matter how illogical that sounds. If it can be defeated, I have failed in my mission, and will so admit I will not continue to believe in a flat earth which was constructed six thousand years ago..
And the first thing we must point out is something which may knock your socks off. It is generally not considered to be important enough to be mentioned because it is based on pure logic, no science involved.