THERE IS ONE MORE RATHER BIG QUESTION WHICH WE HAVE NOT TOUCHED ON AT ALL. IF WE REALLY EXIST, WHY WERE WE CREATED? EVERYTHING HAS AN OPPOSITE. EITHER WE WERE CREATED, OR WE WEREN’T. WE ARE HERE AND IT SEEMS WE WERE CREATED, WHETHER THE REALITY WE THINK WE UNDERSTAND IS THE REAL REALITY, OR NOT, HERE WE ARE. I CANNOT EVEN EXPLAIN THE FOURTH DIMENSION FULLY; HOW DO I ANSWER THIS QUESTION?
IF THE READER CHOOSES TO BELIEVE IN A SUPREME POWER, HE/SHE MIGHT WANT TO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING.
OTHERWISE, THE FOLLOWING IS JUST AN INTERESTING POINT TO CONSIDER.
AS WE HAVE REMARKED PREVIOUSLY, MANKIND WAS CREATED WITH THE POWER OF “THOUGHT” TO CONTROL HIS OWN DESTINY, CHOOSING BETWEEN, WHAT WAS INTENDED TO BE HIS DESTINY, or IGNORE THAT DESTINY FOR WHICH HE WAS INTENDED. NAMELY TO CREATE THAT HEAVEN ON EARTH.
HAS THE SUPREME POWER COMPLETED THE PAINTING?
And so it begins
Taoism Dark Matter Steady State Theory
I believe, at this point, that the key to the answer of the problem lies with three points: Taoism, Dark Matter, and Steady State Theory. The following is merely my speculation. I might accept anyone else’s theory over my own.
With the study of TAOISM there is the inference and study of the unity of opposites. Everything has an opposite. The problem with that theory is the opposites are not always obvious. The opposites may be inferred, but, in our culture, to accept what is not blatantly obvious is to accept things like ghosts and witchcraft.
I have something to slip in here which we have hinted at before, and which I would like to do as a pie in the face presentation before I finish the paper. It is said man is created in the SUPREME POWER’S image. And we have hinted that such power is the power to create, in dream form, whatever, wherever that power takes him, via his own dreams. THAT INFERS HE COULD, ALSO, CREATE OTHERS, LIKE HIMSELF, WHO COULD CREATE LIKEWISE , AS HE COULD , TO THE POINT OF INFINITUM. AND, IT IS ALSO A STRONG HINT AT THE ORIGIN OF THE SUPREME POWER. At this point, I believe it is necessary for me to stop my thinking, and allow the reader to complete his own thinking process.
But, if one stretches their mental comprehension, the concept of an opposite based upon what could be logic, really means the opposite could exist without being observed. Ergo, that would mean that the opposite of a BLACK HOLE, which we have seen, would be a WHITE HOLE, which we have not seen, but which we believe exists.
The BLACK HOLE implodes, and the WHITE HOLE does the opposite, it explodes.
We know there to be within our universe thousands upon thousands of BLACK HOLES, meaning there would be at least many of opposite WHITE HOLES. But where are they?
As we stated before in our text, they are on the other side of the veil, where they are creating their new universe, still one universe being created per WHITE HOLE. The only place where the text is incorrect is: Where I state one universe is created by each WHITE HOLE. At this time, there is no reason to suspect there to be more than one universe. And the WHITE HOLE’S big bang explosion merely adds to that universe. But again, we ask; an entire universe from one little ole’ white hole?
The end is Black, but not “hyper”
No; As I stated before, when the BLACK Hole is no longer being fed, on his side of the veil, because of lack of mass to feed him, he would be taking a break, either wandering around, slowly decreasing in size and strength, just like any other heavenly body, and before it diminishes in size and strength too much, it comes close enough to ingest a new food source, sucking it up, thereby passing it thru the veil to an exploding WHITE HOLE.. At that point, the WHITE HOLE starts erupting again, WITHIN THE SAME UNIVERSE, TOSSING OUT THE BEGINNINGS OF STARS ETC. WITHIN THE SAME AREA WHICH HAD BEEN OCCUPIED BY ITS PREVIOUS REGURIGATION, BUT THAT PREVIOUS ERUPTION HAS EXPANDED OUTWARD, LEAVING A VACUME FOR THIS NEW CREATION, WITHIN THE SAME UNIVERSE.
Next I would like to consider that which is imploded by the BLACK HOLE. This is logical speculation only.
Everything has an opposite, which means MASS (which we shall henceforth refer to as “matter”) should have an opposite also. Yup, there should also be DARK MATTER, the opposite of “OBSERVABLE MATTER”.
Why wouldn’t the creation of MASS, leading to visible matter, also create whatever was necessary to lead to dark matter? At this point of our discussion, the logic involved would be just as likely as not. The BLACK HOLES should be imploding both DARK MATTER and OBSERVABLE MATTER. However, the universe is only able to discern one type. I am not saying there would be a reverse of the visible and not visible of the two matters, although there might be.
That leaves us with the STEADY STATE THEORY. This theory implies there to be a more or less continuous stellar density within the universe This naturally is not accurate to the decimal point, but accurate enough to keep there from being any great stellar overcrowding, or the opposite This is managed by the exploding holes, so that if one looks at the night sky, it seems to be somewhat spread out evenly, except for the areas of galaxies.